As the world watches in horror as the Australian footballer's life is tragically cut short by a vicious foul, it's clear that the game has been put on hold and many questions have been raised about the conduct of the player.
One such question is whether or not the player should be suspended for his actions. The decision to suspend a player from the game can have serious consequences, both for the individual involved and for the wider community.
In this case, the player's actions were clearly malicious and they had no intention of causing harm to anyone. It was also clear that their actions were part of a larger pattern of foul play, which led to the death of another player.
The issue with suspending a player is that it can have far-reaching consequences beyond just the individual who was injured. It can damage the reputation of the sport, reduce public trust in the game, and potentially lead to changes in rules and regulations.
Furthermore, the suspension of the player could have unintended consequences for other players who may feel pressured to conform to the new rules. It's important to remember that sports are about competition and fairness, and any changes made to the game need to be done carefully and thoughtfully.
In conclusion, while it's understandable that the player's actions were malicious, there are valid reasons for suspending them. It's essential to consider all aspects of the situation before making a decision, including the impact on the player and the wider community, and the potential long-term effects on the sport itself. Ultimately, it's up to each individual to decide whether or not to support the player and the sport, but it's important to do so with respect and consideration for everyone involved.